ABOUT YOUR BIZ

Small business owners are busier than most people on earth, and that's why Your Biz is here. For seasoned business owners and budding entrepreneurs alike, we'll tackle it all - health care, franchising, taxes, the latest gadgets and even how to balance work and life. Yes, it's possible, even when you're your own boss.

JJ Ramberg

JJ Ramberg is the anchor of “Your Business,” MSNBC’s weekly show on small business. In addition to her extensive television reporting experience, Ramberg has a background as an entrepreneur and co-founded GoodSearch.com. She has an MBA from Stanford Business School.



Wall Street's troubles trickle down

Posted: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 9:23 AM by Lisa Wilkins
Filed Under: , , , , ,

Sunday night, Eduard Slinin, the owner of Brooklyn-based limo service Corporate Transportation Group, was watching television when he heard news Lehman Brothers might file for bankruptcy.

“I was afraid and worried. Lehman is one of my biggest clients,” says Slinin, whose business services financial firms on Wall Street, driving everyone from top executives to investment bankers to their destinations.

On Monday morning, Slinin’s worse fears turned out to be a reality. Lehman Brothers had filed for bankruptcy.

“I’ve been in this business for 28 years and I never would have thought something like this could happen,” he says.  “We went through the ’87 crash. The 2001 crisis. This is the worst.”

The storm that’s raining down on what were once Wall Street titans is also soaking some small business owners who rely on major financial sector companies for their livelihoods.

For most business owners throughout the country with few ties to the financial world, the havoc on the Street will have little impact, says Bill Dunkelberg, chief economist for the National Federation of Independent Business. That is, unless consumer spending is significantly derailed as a result.

But for entrepreneurs like Slinin, it's a different story.

He got a call from Lehman on Monday telling him that Lehman employee vouchers would no longer be honored, and if employees used his car service they would have to pay by their own credit cards.

With the loss of Lehman, his company, that employees 96 people, could see at 15 percent drop in sales and some layoffs.

Christopher Morgan is president of Corbeau Technologies Inc., a company that implements financial systems for a host of major financial institutions including investment banks.

“We expect to be significantly impacted by the financial crisis that we are seeing today,” he says.

“Our entire business involves implementing back-office systems in financial companies,” he explains.  “These are large-scale, capital projects, that typically are an investment in the tens of millions of dollars at the large financial institutions and millions at smaller companies.”

The crisis on Wall Street could go two ways for Corbeau.

Financial firms may decide capital expenditures need to be put on hold and that could put projects Corbeau now has in the pipeline at risk. Or, on a positive note, he notes, those firms could want “more out of their investment accounting systems -- the systems we implement and support -- therefore needing more from companies like Corbeau Technologies.”  

So basically, entrepreneurs like Morgan and Slinin are holding their breath and hoping the financial industry turmoil won’t ravage their bottomlines.

“Today there’s a lot of panic,” says Slinin about recent Wall Street events. “I believe things will rebound.”

Are you all as optimistic as Slinin? How will Wall Street's woes impact your business?

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

This is what is always over looked during these type of situations. No one thinks of the "little guy" when big companies collaspe. As much as everyone won't agree there needs to be more regulation in big buisness to prevent this stuff in the future. I don't know how much more the US economy can take.
Plead the 5th.  Say that you want the "Chuck Keating Bailout Plan".  Supeona McCain and Palin as key witnesses.  Being homeless ain'T all that bad...
Today I was listening to the Bill Press show, and a truck driver called in from Dallas saying that 3 million people have been left homeless this month in Dallas due to the housing crisis, I'm not sure about his numbers, but the story was compelling. I'm sure for alot of the fringe of our society this has truely been a crisis. After their homes are forclosed they can't rent due to being a deemed a bad credit risk. These are families who end up living in hotels, in their cars, and on the streets. What's next debtor prisons? What is happening to these hundreds of thousands who are losing their jobs, and the millions who are losing their homes?
It has occured to me that the necessity for all these bailouts citing the enormous size of the business and its resulting impact on the US or global economy as the reason we have to pump billions of tax dollars into a rescue, is simply due to mega-merger after mega-merger.  We have allowed so many companies to gather up huge portions of the business segment that we can't let one fail without it dragging down the world economy.

We need more players, not less, to keep a comptitive capitalist marketplace.  But, the solution to the problem... you guessed it more consolidation.  We are in need of a Federal Trade Commission that does an ATT type of break-up on any company that controls over 30% of the market in any definable segment, cell service, mortgages, lettuce, or oil.  Competition is healthy, mergers are not!
I believe this is called trickle down economics.  Thank you Mr. Regan,Mr. Bush and Mr. Bush.
So we hit a big bump in the road. Life happens. Get off your butt and go find another job. If you lose your house, rent for a few years until you're able to buy another one. Be a grown-up and quit whining and quit waiting for the government to solve all your problems.
If you want your life to be better next time around, then spend less than you make, have a crisi fund set aside of six months expenses, and get out of debt. There are no magic pills to prosperity, just hard work and the kind of common sense our grandparents had.
I have read most of the comments left concerning this article. I dout any of these people really know anything about the current or past market places, but, the "Consumer Capitalist," system we have been in for over the past 50 years is not, and never will work. I say we do away with things such as planed and perceived obsolescence, and build a whole new system, based on quality, reliability, and "green" companies and products. A complete "overhaul" of no only the American government, to our markets is the only way to make the changes necessary, for our present future, and the future of our (and the worlds) children.
Trickle down economics doesn't work. It is a bad policy, the rich get richer the middle class stays middle class and the poor have a low "success" rate of hitting middle class. If the goverment truly wants to help the econonomy they should spend 700 billion on real buissness. Or buy spend 700 billion in the form of goverment checks to homeowners that can only be used to pay mortgages. If the average cost of a home is 200k, and every person gets 20k to pay 10% of there home costs, up to 20k. Thats 35 million people who can keep there homes, and now can put money into the economy. If the avg intrest rate is 7%, 700 billion will pay for itself in 7 years in the us economy by the intrest saved over a 7 year period. Turning 700 billion into 1.4 trillion in 7 years guaranteed seems like a better idea to me. However that doesn't include increased productivity, people with homes are more likely to get better jobs then people living in a car.

This (bailout) is crazy. No one wants to say it will work, no one is willing to go out on a limb and say this will make things better, at best people are told it will stop things from being as bad as they would if we didn't do a bailout. However they will not say it will stop things from getting worse.

I like most americans would feel better about the economy if 700 billion was given to homeowners as of 2007 who had a household income of less then 200k.

That money would trickle UP, not down. it would be given to buisness across the board, increasing there bottomlines as the money was spent. As money was spent to pay off debt, more loans written off as "bad" would start to be paid back. The increased income from american productivity over the next few years would end up paying the money back in taxes,

How, oh how, is everyone stuck on reganomics. It obviosly is not working. I think if the american people voted to spend 700 billion to help the companies that caused this crisis to stay in buisness or 700 billion to homeowners it would be no quistion. Yet the greatest minds assume that 90% of america is illiterate. I challenge MSN money to do a poll. 700 billion to bailout these companies, or 700 billion to homeowners.
Problems solved for everybody. Definitely pass this one on!



What do you think? There is no end to American ingenuity!



A bail-out plan that makes sense.

I'm against the $85 BILLION bail-out of AIG. Instead, I'm in favor of giving $85,000,000,000 to America in a "We Deserve It" dividend. To make the math simple, let's assume there are 200,000,000 bona fide U.S. citizens, aged 18+.

Our population is about 301 million counting every man, woman and child. So, 200,000,000 might be a fair stab at adults 18 and up. Now, divide 200 million, 18+ adults into $85 billion - that equals $425,000.00 each! Yes, my plan is to give that $425,000 to every adult as a "We Deserve It" dividend.

Of course, it would NOT be tax free. So, let's assume a tax rate of 30%. Everyone would pay $127,500.00 in taxes. That sends $25.5 billion right back to Uncle Sam! It also means that every adult 18+ has $297,500.00 in their pocket. A husband and wife would have $595,000.00!

What would you do with $297,500.00 to $595,000.00?

Pay off your mortgage - housing crisis solved.

Repay college loans - what a great boost to new grads.

Put away money for college - it'll really be there.

Save in a bank - create money to loan to entrepreneurs.

Buy a new car - create jobs .

Invest in the market - capital drives growth.

Pay for your parent's medical insurance - health care improves.

Enable dead-beat parents to come clean - or else.

Remember this is for every adult U.S. citizen, 18 and older (including the folks who lost their jobs at Lehmann Brothers and every other company that is cutting back) and of course, for those serving in our Armed Forces.

If we're going to re-distribute wealth let's really do it! Instead of trickling out a puny $1,000.00 "economic incentive". If we're going to do an $85 billion bail-out, let's bail out every adult U.S. citizen!

As for AIG - liquidate it. Sell off its parts.

Let American General go back to being American General. Sell off the real estate. Let the private sector bargain hunters cut it up and clean it up.

We deserve the money and AIG doesn't. Sure it's a crazy idea, but can you imagine the coast-to-coast block party?!

How do you spell Economic Boom? W-e D-e-s-e-r-v-e I-t d-i-v-i-d-e-n-d! I trust my fellow adult Americans to know how to use the $85 Billion "We Deserve It" dividend more than do the 'geniuses' at AIG or in Washington, D.C..

And remember, my plan only really costs $59.5 billion because $25.5 billion is returned instantly in taxes to Uncle Sam. Good idea? I think so.
This is why the above example of distributing money to all USA adults does not happen.
There current estimated number of adults, (18 and over) in the USA is 223,501,749.
Give each one $1 & that's $223,501,749 Million
Give each one $10 & that's $2,235,017,490 Billion
Give each one $100 & that's $22,350,174,900 Billion
Give each one $1,000 & that's $223,501,749,000 Billion
Give each one $10,000 & that's $2,235,017,490,000 Trillion
Give each one $100,000 & that's $22,350,174,900,000 Trillion
Give each one $200,000 & that's $44,700,349,800,000 Trillion


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):